CHICAGO -- A 2018 paper by members of the Stanford History Education Group called out historians for failing to value evidence of student learning as much as they value evidence in their historical analyses. The authors’ occasion for rebuke? Their recent finding that many students don’t learn critical thinking in undergraduate history courses -- a challenge to history’s sales pitch that its graduates are finely tuned critical thinkers. Even among juniors and seniors in a sample of...
READ FULL ARTICLE »
Become a member to take advantage of more features, like commenting and voting.
Register or sign in today!